Oppression is genetic. The Third Option has a treatment plan to downgrade Oppression to a chronic but manageable condition. The following exploration of Racism is meant, in part, to demonstrate how The Third Option plans to dismantle Racism at the systemic level.

By Robert Simmons
Atonement: A White People’s Four-Step Program
Table Of Contents
- STEP ONE: Taking Ownership
- STEP TWO: “To Know Thyself is the Beginning of Wisdom”
- STEP THREE: How to Be an Educated Racist
- Blockbusting, Steering and Redlining: Segregation Nation
- Eminent Domain, Environmental Racism, Payday Loans, and Food Deserts: There Goes the Neighborhood
- Felony Disenfranchisement, ‘Tough on Crime’ Laws, School-to-Prison Pipelines: Business as Usual
- Code Switching, Micro-Aggressions, Intergenerational Trauma: You Give, We Take
- ‘Police’ Patrols, Gentrification, Affirmative Action: When Helping Isn’t Really Helping
- Open Your Mind, and Close the Gap
- STEP FOUR: So You Don’t Want to Talk About Race? Then We’re Going to Have to Fix It
- The People vs. The United States of America: A ‘Class’ Action Lawsuit that is Civil
STEP ONE: Taking Ownership
In my research on the history of taxonomy, it became apparent that [Botanist Carl Linnaeus] promoted deeply misguided theories regarding human variation. These views effectively laid the groundwork for scientific racism—the pseudoscientific idea that racism can be justified with empirical evidence. These completely faulty ideas continue to shape how some people think about race today—as a biological fact rather than as a social construct
Brittany Kenyon-Flatt, North Carolina State University
Into The Heart of Darkness: A Brief History of The Human Race(s)
In the age of so-called ‘Enlightenment’, Europeans, using the Bible as their main reference, determined that the landing place of Noah’s Ark – the Caucasus Mountain region – was the true origin of man and his descendants. This myth (that Caucasians were the original – and thus superior – ‘race’), fit in with similar religious-based science of the time, such as the earth being flat, or situated at the center of the universe, with a sun that revolved around it.
If one looks out in every direction, ‘as far as the eye can see’, they would discover themselves to be in the exact center of their visual range. Those who seek confirmation that they are indeed the center of the universe, and that everything revolves around them, would no doubt be satisfied by this discovery, and look no further. If science can be performed simply by using one’s eyes and a Bible, it makes sense that skin color might also qualify as a way to ‘classify’ various people. And so it came to pass.
Armed with a ‘scientific’ taxonomy that divided people into four distinct groups – Europeans, Asians, Africans, and Native Americans – white people began their unique history of imperialistic conquest. Deemed a cultural crusade to ‘civilize’ more backward peoples, this white plague eventually spread to the North American continent, where it still resides today.
From its inception (in 1790), the U.S. Census has racially classified all the living descendants of those who made America great, through their subjugation, assimilation, annihilation, marginalization, enslavement, displacement, and internment. Since 1820, race classification has been used against the “free colored” population, hindering their ability “to vote, own property, marry across racial lines, enter various professions [or] seek advanced education.”
From this, a working definition can be derived:
Race (n) – a fabricated hierarchal designation first invented by white Europeans (then applied by their American descendants) in order to justify the Oppression of all other indigenous populations.
The TAKEAWAY: White people invented Race, and therefore are ‘Racists’. Current United States institutions (like government, education, healthcare, rehabilitation, immigration, et al) are built on a foundation of ‘Racism’. This is confirmed by the U.S. Government Census, that continues to recognize the fabricated hierarchal designation of ‘Race’. It has no choice at this point. What is done cannot be undone. Our ancestors fashioned this weapon of racial hierarchy, and with it, forever altered the trajectory of human society.
360 Degrees of (Trust) Separation
Taking ownership of one’s actions, especially when they cause harm to others, is called ‘accountability’. It has been the consistent policy of the United States to never admit to (let alone repent for) the sins of the past, no matter how egregious the violation. This is one of many obstacles along a rocky path toward reconciliation.
Each step we take away from each other represents a degree of separation that is measured in trust. The ‘trust gap’ between whites and non-whites is so wide at this point, it cannot be ‘walked back’ with a few empty words or gestures; atonement can only come in the form of discernible actions.
To assure that these actions align with the desired goal – to dismantle Oppression – it behooves us to better understand the psychology of Oppression.
STEP TWO: “To Know Thyself is the Beginning of Wisdom”
To Know Thyself is the Beginning of Wisdom
Socrates
The Mind is a Terrible Thing
The whole of human suffering can be traced back to a problem in semantics: when we talk about Power, what we really mean is Control.
In the beginning, there is only Ignorance and Uncertainty. It can be said that our entire lives are an attempt to manage both of these. ‘Control’ is one of the survival strategies organisms use to manage this Uncertainty; to ‘Adapt’ is the other. If an organism believes it can Control its environment, it will ‘fight’ to do so; otherwise, the ‘flight’ response kicks in, and organisms go to Plan B, attempting to Adapt to their ‘oppressive’ surroundings. This makes up the yin and yang of our existence.
Our Hindbrain Calls the Shots
Without a single conscious thought, early humans fed, fought, fled, and fornicated their way along, generation after generation. As we developed ‘brains’ (meaning a forebrain), and achieved ‘awareness’, we instantly (and mistakenly) assumed we were using these newfound ‘brains’ to freely think, choose, and act, when in reality this has never been the case.

The signals to consume, fight, flee, and reproduce are all still firing from within our unconscious ‘hindbrain’, which then directs our fancy new forebrain to ‘go fetch’. This has certainly led to more and more sophisticated ways to fight (war machines), flee (through our addictions), consume (aka ‘consumerism’) and reproduce (Tinder, Grindr, Match, Her et al), but what we are witnessing today is merely the zenith of our Ignorance, or at best the very earliest stage of true Self-Awareness.
What does the Hindbrain Want? More and More
The human body is built with a large hole drilled right through the middle of it. Whatever we feed ourselves empties right out the bottom; therefore, we quite literally can never get ‘enough’. Our hindbrain’s constant drive to satiate itself forces the ‘others’ around it to either fight back or keep the ‘peace’ (aka ‘Adapt’). Those who do not wish conflict will ultimately be bullied into receiving LESS. This drive for MORE, embodied in the larger paradigm of Economic Growth, currently threatens to collapse the entire ecosystem of our planet, as all other organisms are being forced to slowly ‘adapt’ themselves into extinction.
The Hindbrain does not think. It labels.
The hindbrain has the ‘people skills’ of a vulture. Its only task is to navigate the Uncertainty, which sometimes leads it into the area of ‘human relations’. US and THEM are the rudimentary labels used to separate what is known from what is unknown. There is no concept of space or time for the hindbrain, so pretty much anything outside its immediate sensory range might as well not exist. In order to survive, however, it must be ready to fight or flee at any time; this likely generates a kind of free-floating anxiety, that if reinforced, through actual traumatic experiences, would manifest itself into a constant paranoia about some vague THEM, who exists somewhere ‘out there’, beyond sensory range. This, by the way, is the simplest and best argument for our continued ‘desegregation’, in order to create ‘diversity’. As white person Brené Brown points out, ‘people are hard to hate close up’.

Of course, when we find ourselves in a battle for survival, or even in some form of controlled competition, our hindbrain is quite useful. The problem occurs when we ignorantly make everything a competition, like we do in our current Economic Growth model. This is where Systemic Oppression could be greatly alleviated. The constant drive toward increased hierarchal ‘Status’ locks our hindbrain impulses into the ON position. The steady stream of free-floating anxiety which ensues needs an outlet – a THEM – and thus makes some form of ‘othering’ guaranteed. Whether it is malicious MicroAggressions, (which we will discuss momentarily), or questionable cries of ‘reverse racism’, the real issue gets sidestepped: that we are all feeling the effects of this systemic manipulation of our hindbrain.
To seek the MORE from outside ourselves is the root of human oppression, conflict, and suffering. The Third Option seeks to shift this paradigm of Control to one of Power, by refocusing us to seek the MORE from within ourselves instead. It also plans to tie all our fates together, so that the more each of us achieves, the more we benefit as a whole. More on this later.
Word of the Day: Proactive
Philosopher John Rawls had a Theory of Justice: ‘Step One’ involved performing a ‘thought experiment’, where individuals placed themselves behind a ‘Veil of Ignorance’, and imagined they were about to be born into existence. For this experiment, they were given no control over their ethnicity, social status, gender or “individual idea of how to lead a good life”; they were only given control of how to organize the society into which they were being born. From this Original Position of being ‘created equal’, the hope was that people would come to the only logical conclusion: to fashion a society based on fairness and inclusivity for all.
The Third Option ‘thought experiment’ is for each individual to take their Intelligence and attempt to separate it from their Non-Intelligence (aka Ignorance). With a bit of meditation to calm the hindbrain, a period of forebrain reflection may occur – a brief moment between thinking about sex, food, sleep, sex, defecating, or getting high on something. Once we, as a society, point our growing Awareness directly at our Ignorant self, we will begin to reach, quite simply, ‘Self’ Awareness. There is a brutish Ignorance in all of us, and through some deep-seated Shame about it, we constantly try to prove ourselves ‘past’ this brutishness, when all evidence points to the contrary. We have ignorantly chosen to treat the subject of our Ignorance as ‘taboo’, and live a constant existence of ‘don’t ask don’t tell’.
To achieve mastery over any weakness (such as Ignorance), one must first identify the weakness – not to judge it, but to better isolate it – in order to manage it, or even overcome it, but most definitely not to let It continue to rule over us by pretending It does not exist.
STEP THREE: How to Be an Educated Racist
Blockbusting, Steering and Redlining: Segregation Nation
Also called ‘panic peddling’, Blockbusting comprised a money-making strategy used by real estate agents, who scared white home owners into selling their properties ‘below market value’, by informing them that black families, seeking local employment, were looking to move into their neighborhood. Once whites ‘fled’ the neighborhood, real estate agents would resell the property to a black family at a price ‘above market value’; the bank would get its cut by tacking a high interest rate onto the loan. They were able to get away with this because government employed a policy of ‘Redlining’ neighborhoods based on high and low financial risk, then passed this information on to mortgage lenders, in order to more subtly segregate the various neighborhoods. Black families had very few options; real estate agents were ‘steering’ them into specific neighborhoods, where banks would then approve the loans. Investigative reporting at the time showed how whites with less income would still get loans over relatively wealthy blacks, as part of a ‘credit rationing’ policy aimed to give whites the financial edge in wealth creation, through exclusive use of private banks. The overall effect was one of White flight into newly-built, outlying ‘suburbs’, leaving black families behind in the inner city.
Eminent Domain, Environmental Racism, Payday Loans, and Food Deserts: There Goes the Neighborhood
As White Flight morphed into Urban Sprawl, white people needed the best roads taxpayer money could buy, to get them back and forth quickly between their new home in the suburbs and their job back in the city. Highway and Freeway systems take up space, which is where the Federal Government mandate of Eminent Domain – to take private property away for public use – came in handy. Author Richard Rothstein details the process in his book, The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America.
“The Underwriting Manual of the Federal Housing Administration recommended that highways be a good way to separate African-American from white neighborhoods. So this was not a matter of law, it was a matter of government regulation.” – Richard Rothstein
Whatever property was not usurped for freeway construction, got devalued by its presence. Industry, especially the polluting kind, needs cheap land and lax regulations in order to operate, and city planners, seemingly desperate to generate economic value in these newly impoverished areas, sold out their constituents. Black families could now be found living beside freeways, chemical plants, oil refineries, power plants, coal mines, or the like. They call this, quite appropriately, Environmental Racism.
Where there is no money to be made, profit-seeking businesses like banks, healthcare facilities, and grocery stores tend to move out, leaving more predatory businesses to move in and fill the void. In a process called ‘Reverse Redlining’, black families were targeted with much higher cost products. “Check cashing fees can be 6% or more”…“The cost of a loan from a payday lender is typically $15 for every $100 borrowed…for a two-week loan, that’s effectively a 391% APR. If the loan isn’t repaid in full…a fee is added on and the cycle repeats…within a few months, borrowers can end up owing…an average of $520 in fees to borrow $375.”
Where Grocery stores exited, convenience stores, smoke shops, liquor stores, and cheap fast food entered to take its place. Welcome to a ‘Food Desert’, where nothing healthy grows. As healthcare issues skyrocket, actual health ‘care’ flatlines within these neighborhoods, because even healthcare, ironically, is not designed for people, only for profit.
Felony Disenfranchisement, ‘Tough on Crime’ Laws, School-to-Prison Pipelines: Business as Usual
For Black Americans, there was a surge of laws established after the Civil War which not only doled out severe punishments for petty crimes, it also attached those convictions to suspended voting rights (See Black Codes). Even today, an estimated 5.1 million voting-age US citizens were disenfranchised during the 2020 presidential election because of a felony conviction (this represents 1 out of every 44 citizens). Meanwhile, “Black men are six times as likely to be incarcerated as white men and Latinos are 2.5 times as likely. For Black men in their thirties, about 1 in every 12 is in prison or jail on any given day.” The Sentencing Project
The early Slave Codes were designed to restrict the freedom to vote, bear arms, practice religious freedom – even read and write. While policies are constantly being amended to undo discrimination ‘on paper’, continued restrictions, even to this day, point to a ‘rich’ history of systemic abuse.
When President Nixon announced his War on Drugs, which was followed up with Reagan Era ‘Truth in Sentencing’ legislation (complete with mandatory minimum sentencing and Three Strikes laws), Black Americans were treated to a modern version of Slave Code and Black Code traditions. Each gram of ‘crack’ cocaine would get non-whites a year in prison. Forget about the cocaine and opioid stats – white people also used crack more than black people, yet the conviction rate was still 7 times higher for blacks. In the early 1990’s, the gap rose as high as 13 to 1.
“The crack years was one of the most racist periods of our government,” confessed former DEA agent Robert M. Stutman (who also confessed to being “white and very conservative”, which apparently implies that drug ‘crack’-downs were considered racist even by racist standards – it also implies that he has not read very much American History). Laws ensuring the longest possible prison time (mandatory minimum sentencing) turned black drug offenses into the criminal equivalent of White murder convictions.
Meanwhile, schools were also imposing these ‘zero tolerance’ policies. Students deemed ‘difficult’ were expelled, no matter what their age. Parents were often working and not at home to supervise these children, so they drifted out into the streets, which acts like a ‘catch basin’, designed to collect the ‘runoff’ and filter it straight into the prison industrial pipeline.
Code Switching, Micro-Aggressions, Intergenerational Trauma: You Give, We Take
For black folks, Code Switching is a performance involving language, behavior, even appearance, all designed to assuage the fears of white people in various social or professional settings. It began in the Civil War South, as black people “dumbed down their literacy and downplayed their dignity when faced with the crack of the slaver’s whip or the scrag of Jim Crow’s noose.”(this from Ida Harris). Today, it still comes in handy at routine traffic stops.
Atlanta’s Dr. Dione Mahaffey claims it to be “exhausting, but I wouldn’t go as far to call it inauthentic, because it’s an authentic part of the Black American experience.” As a new teacher, Ida Harris caught herself code switching when she addressed a room full of white kids for the first time. “My code-switching in the classroom occurred because I doubted that my authentic self was enough to be in the room, and that further complicated how I felt about myself. Because I’m now more consciously aware of the impact code-switching had on me, I’m almost certain I won’t do it again. However, I realize that code-switching, for some, is not about assimilating – but surviving – and well, I’m not sure how to feel about that.”

W.E.B. Dubois referred to this phenomenon as a “double-consciousness, this sense of always looking at one’s self through the eyes of others”. One friend puts it this way: “I feel like I always need to make a good impression when I speak to white people, because I may be the only black person they’ll ever get to meet up close”.
White folks need to know that blacks folks are beneath them in the social hierarchy. Code Switching is one way black folks assure white folks they are not a threat. Unfortunately, white folks still feel threatened; MicroAggressions are the ‘passive-aggressive’ way to put black folks back ‘into their place’. Psychologist Derald W. Sue (author of MicroAggressions and Marginality andMicroAggressions in Everyday Life) describes MicroAggressions as “the everyday slights, indignities, put downs and insults that people of color, women, LGBT populations or those who are marginalized experience in their day-to-day interactions with people”. Sue breaks MicroAggressions down into three categories:
- MicroAssaults are intentionally discriminatory remarks, somehow believed to not be offensive, like telling a racist joke, then claiming it was ‘just a joke’.
- MicroInsults are unintentionally discriminatory remarks, like telling someone that they “are really smart – for a woman”.
- MicroInvalidations downplay or even negate other people’s experiences, like telling a black person that “racism does not exist in today’s society.”
There is nothing opaque or subtle about MicroAggressions; they range from insensitive to asinine. While most researchers attempt to ‘white-wash’ this behavior as somehow unconsciously done, some are beginning to make the link between racism and low intelligence.
Intergenerational trauma is trauma that is passed down. The pain and the angst and the hurt and the fear and…the sense of inferiority that has been imposed on you.
Myrna Lashley
The stress of trying to ‘fit in’ where one never seems to fit in wears on the health of our black community. Intergenerational Trauma is the manifestation of this post-traumatic stress (this ‘legacy of loss’, as social worker Sue Coyle puts it), and it is passed on, through both nature and nurture, from parent to child. It is a cycle that must be broken, or this legacy will become all our legacies, because we are all accomplices in this crime.
‘Police’ Patrols, Gentrification, Affirmative Action: When Helping Isn’t Really Helping
Slave Patrols were armed groups of private citizens – white male citizens – who were allowed to voluntarily police enslaved black folks, in order to restrict their movements and maintain a measure of White domination. Today, white police officers still serve as ‘patrollers’ of black neighborhoods, dispensing inequitable, arbitrary and reactive law enforcement measures designed to perpetuate this paradigm of White domination.
Meanwhile, land within predominantly non-white communities is being bought up by developers; gentrification is the private sector’s answer to eradicating poverty: simply bring the suburbs back into the inner city. Designed to ‘increase the economic value’ of the neighborhood, it has proven to be just another way to push poor people aside. The new homes are too expensive for anyone already living there, and to maintain the safety of all new homeowners, police presence gets ramped up even further. One would hope that people coming back to these city centers would be doing so to create diversity, but often, they want the neighborhood to assimilate to their sensibilities, to the point of even shutting down longstanding neighborhood fixtures, like annual festivals and parades, basketball courts, live music, or just plain ‘hanging out’ (white people call it loitering). “Culturally, I think the way that a lot of African American and Latino people experience gentrification is as a form of colonization.” – Paul Butler,Chokehold: Policing Black Men
Affirmative Action is a term thrown around wildly in conversations about race – usually by those who are firmly on the ‘there is no racism/there is only reverse-racism/affirmative action is racist against white people’ crowd. When not used as an argument, it’s used as an insult: ‘Oh yeah, you’re just an affirmative action hire’.
Ijeoma Oluo, So You Want to Talk About Race
Still, Ijeoma stands by affirmative action. She is very clear that it is not “the racial panacea that some had originally hoped” and it “will never be more than a Band-Aid on a festering sore” if we continue to allow the systemic part of racial oppression to remain. What we see happening to ‘affirmative action’ is what we see in almost all ‘band-aid’ fixes: a noble idea – like the Affordable Care Act, for instance – slowly turns into ‘Obamacare’. Next, conservatives begin playing Jenga with it, pulling parts of it away here and there, until it teeters on the edge. For this reason, the Third Option agrees with Ijeoma – let’s not take our eye off the ball here; let’s fix the ‘systemic’ part of the racial oppression.
Open Your Mind, and Close the Gap
- Ijeoma Oluo,So You Want to Talk About Race
- Richard Rothstein, The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America.
- Ibram X. Kendi,How to Be an AntiRacist
- Paul Butler,Chokehold: Policing Black Men
- Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw,Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement
- Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness
- W.E.B. Dubois,The Souls of Black Folks
- James Baldwin, The Fire Next Time
- Derald W. Sue, MicroAggressions and Marginality andMicroAggressions in Everyday Life
- Dr. Kevin Nadal, That’s So Gay!” Microaggressions and the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Community
STEP FOUR: So You Don’t Want to Talk About Race? Then We’re Going to Have to Fix It
Toward A ‘Third Option’: Make Every one an Offer They Can’t Refuse
The concept of the Third Option is simple because we have taken out all the Oppression and Corruption. Systems only become complicated because they are oppressive and corrupt. People have been oppressed for so long, they are used to everything being complicated, and therefore would probably trust the plan more if they weren’t able to understand it. Either way, the Third Option is not going to put any Oppression or Corruption in there just to make people feel better about it. Sorry for the inconvenience.
It starts with a National Public Bank, like our nation’s 1st and 2nd Bank of the United States (founded by first Treasury Secretary, Alexander Hamilton). Andrew Jackson decided to get rid of the bank in 1832 – he also got rid of Native Americans around that same time (see Trail of Tears), in order to expand southern slavery to the point where only a war could stop it. That makes him a moron, a racist, and an asshole (he was also a sociopath apparently).
Private Banks have definitely been used as a tool of Oppression in the United States, but banks aren’t so bad, once you own one. Think of this bank as one of those giant department store chains.
We would put one in each community – 3300 individual department stores in all – plus a ‘corporate headquarters’, located in Washington D.C. Each ‘department’ store would have a department of agriculture, healthcare, housing, transportation, communication, water / sewer, green energy, and education. Each department store would be owned and operated locally, using employees educated and living within each community.
Large corporations like this need serious financing; for this reason, we’d have to ‘go public’. Instead of selling shares on Wall Street, however, we are going directly to the people on ‘Main Street’. Every American would become an ‘equal’ shareholder in this corporation [this would demonstrate that we are still “dedicated to the proposition that all people are created equal”]. Not every one has money to invest, so we would instead eliminate the current Federal Income Tax, and collect an Income ‘Investment’ equal to 10% of every one’s annual salary.
The good news is that we have just created a self-sustaining circular economy. We made the jobs to create the basic needs services that would in turn sustain us. A portion of the income from these jobs would provide us with the following year’s ‘income investment’, that we would use to create more goods and services (small business loans, student loans, housing loans, infrastructure loans, etc). We would pay back the loans when we purchased the goods or used the services we had created (food, healthcare premiums, utility bills, rent or mortgage payments, car registration, etc.). Normally, this money would go to the private sector, but we would be the owners of this corporation – our shareholder investment created all of it – so all the money goes back into our Bank, plus interest. This would create ‘shareholder dividends’, that would accrue over time, and eventually become a steady income stream in retirement (this means we would not need to have a payroll tax anymore, either). Because we would not look to make a profit off of ourselves on products like housing, electricity, food, etc., the ‘cost of living’ would become more ‘affordable’, thus creating a ‘living wage‘, not by having to raise the minimum wage (though we would do that, also), but by lowering the actual ‘cost’ of living. This scenario could never happen within the current Economic Growth Model.
Okay. We would rebuild every community – complete with jobs, healthcare, affordable essential needs, lowered taxes, and guaranteed retirement – but there are other (more specific) ways we could alleviate Racism systemically. Here are a few examples.
Education Plus Healthcare: The Rehabilitation Pipeline
In the current model, a child has two choices: go to school or go to prison. School does not guarantee employment, prison does not guarantee ‘rehabilitation’, and community has no effective mechanism for helping guide kids (or adults) when they are stranded between the two.

Our society fails to provide adequate Liberty, then holds the threat of prison up as if to say “see – it could be worse.” In the Third Option Model, there will be no more prisons; our Liberty already takes enough of a beating. There will only be Education and Healthcare, and by healthcare we mean Mental Healthcare. It will serve as the new ‘mechanism’ to catch people before they ‘fall through the cracks’. The road of life is long – all of us will occasionally need a little 24-hour ‘roadside assistance’. Some will say this is not profitable, but A) this is not about profit, it is about people, and B) in reality, people are expensive to fix once they are broken; ‘front end’ maintenance – to keep us all running smoothly – is actually cheaper.
Working hard for something we don’t care about is called stress. Working hard for something we love is called passion.
Simon Sinek
Education would now be geared toward seeking the MORE from within ourselves; the National Bank would tie all our fates together. Thus, each person’s ‘Self-Actualization‘ (becoming the best version of oneself) would benefit every one by association.
‘Mental Healthcare’ would be available for parents and children; this might take the form of childcare, after school care, counseling, even prenatal / postnatal care. Mental Health would also be present out in the community, in case various forms of rehabilitation are needed. Temporary Housing would be built to facilitate people transitioning between this rehabilitation.
Twenty-five percent of incarcerated people have committed violence against another person. To start, the Third Option would separate out the other 1.7 million, and send them to a School-slash-Healthcare facility, where they would be treated for any addictions or mental health issues they might have, while simultaneously working to earn an associate degree in one of the basic needs fields offered through the bank. This can all be paid for by confiscating each individual’s annual ‘share’ from the bank for the two years they spend earning this degree. Translation: only those who are convicted would incur any cost in this ‘rehabilitation’ strategy. For more on the plan, go here or here or here.
Meanwhile, Back in our Communities:
We need Diversity. Inbreeding, whether it be physical, mental, or political, has proven unhealthy for us as a nation. To encourage diversity at the structural level, The Third Option would offer affordable housing for all basic needs employees, but only in the neighborhoods where they are currently employed. In this way, there could be a potential connection formed between the people who purchase neighborhood goods and services, and those who deliver them. Perhaps they might occasionally acknowledge each other out on the street, as they are, in reality, intrinsically tied together.
We need to be Understood. Besides Mental Health Counselors and Social Workers (who would comprise some of the fastest growing occupations in this Emerging Future), we would also need ‘counselors’ on the street; let’s call them ‘Federal Peace Advocates,’ until someone comes up with a better name. Tamar Manasseh has proven (within her own Chicago community) that having a visible, caring, and familiar presence out on the street does make a difference in how we treat each other. In The Third Option Plan, there would now be less people in Washington DC, and more people available to represent and serve folks at the community level.
If you were ever voted ‘Most Friendly’ in high school (or some similar award), this would be the job for you. Instead of police being the first responders, ‘Peace Advocates’ would be nearby to assist people (to serve) and also deescalate any issues between people if necessary (to protect). Peace Advocates could always ‘call in the calvary’ if there appears to be no choice, but could then become an objective observer in whatever transpires, and also serve as an interpreter who could speak for both parties, in order to make sure every one is treated with the proper respect.
The Third Option believes that once people truly owned their community, and had a stake in its success, they would be able to hold themselves accountable – as a community – and not need police to do it for them. Within schools, the indigenous practice of Restorative Justice (having all parties ‘talk it out’ with a mediator present) could similarly be applied, and again eliminate the need for a police presence. In most cases, police arrive late to a crime scene; in some cases, they create a crime scene where none existed. The issue of ‘crime’ will never be effectively solved ‘after the fact’; we must proactively ask ourselves “what can we do, as a society, to identify and address the systemic causes of criminal behavior in people?” It is a question that those in ‘Control’ never ask, because they already know the answer, and the answer does not serve their interests. By the way, more Fairness, more Certainty, and more Inclusivity is how to eliminate so-called ‘criminal behavior’. Read more about the Third Option plan here.
We Need to be Heard. The Third Option recommends that communication infrastructure be considered a universal human right, and thus within the scope of Federal oversight, in order to secure a more ‘inter-connected’ system for all. The Communication Grid we propose would serve our Healthcare, Banking, and Education agendas, but would also be used to tie Communities to their citizens, and to all other Communities.
People could share stories, take polls and surveys, and get quick feedback about any real time issues within their communities. At the ‘inter-community’ level, any successful innovations (whether in health, education, logistics, or goods and services) could be passed onto all communities in real time. Nationally, the right to vote could finally be guaranteed. Internationally, our students would need the Grid to fulfill their educational payback assignment: to help bring basic needs infrastructure to the ‘Bottom Billion’.
Politically, our current communication system works perfectly – if you are an Oppressor. It gives every one a voice, but no power to make change. It turns up the volume, and points the speakers right back at each other – nothing but ‘feedback’ – vented emotional frustration directed at ourselves, or in ‘echo chambers’, where at least someone ‘hears’ us. This is yet another oppressive system doing exactly what it is designed to do. The Third Option solution would finally give every citizen a chance to improve the world locally, nationally, and internationally; likely, if someone were to use their voice to do nothing but complain, they would no longer be considered relevant to the discussion. In the current environment, however, complainers make eight-figure salaries.
There is a lot of work to do. It will be a process that cannot begin until we ‘upgrade’ the nearly 300-year Operating System to better reflect the people we want to be now. Our institutions are filthy with racism; they cannot be salvaged. They must be replaced.
For our actions to be effective, they must be organized around some foundational premise. Think of this premise as an overall Mission Statement, or a general working hypothesis that can guide each of our decisions. The Third Option has chosen this premise:
All People Are Created Equal.
If this premise is true, then we must assume it is only upon entering society that one becomes ‘unequal’. If there is something within our societal ‘environment’ (meaning our upbringing, location, societal position, current circumstances, etc.) that is creating a marked or observable effect on the equality of any citizen, a society based on the premise that ‘all people are created equal’ would naturally seek to improve that environment. Otherwise, there would be no ‘Liberty and Justice for all’, and any one using such words to describe our current arrangement would naturally be a liar. If said person also currently enjoys the privilege of being ‘more equal’ than the others around him, that person would be a liar and a hypocrite.
The People vs. The United States of America: A ‘Class’ Action Lawsuit that is Civil

Intersectionality is a theory developed by Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw that demonstrates, among other things, that A) there is a line around the block of people who are discriminated against, oppressed, and dominated, and B) Every one has the potential to be both victim and perpetrator, and often in more than one way. The Third Option feels it is crucial to name OPPRESSION as the main suspect in this overall crime, if the People hope to seek ‘proper damages’ (i.e., true systemic change); filing a ‘class action lawsuit’ (i.e., having all oppressed groups speak together in one voice) would be infinitely more effective. This justice analogy is fairly accurate, as individual litigation would tend to drag on through the court of public opinion, only to reach some quiet settlements here and there, but never actually help the other victims of this crime – a crime felt by a full 70% of the population, at the very least.
If the People ever wish to mount a class action civil lawsuit against Oppression, the Third Option would like to go on the record as saying we would gladly represent the People on this matter.
Further Reading
- Ijeoma Oluo,So You Want to Talk About Race
- Richard Rothstein, The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America.
- Ibram X. Kendi,How to Be an AntiRacist
- Paul Butler,Chokehold: Policing Black Men
- Derald W. Sue, MicroAggressions and Marginality andMicroAggressions in Everyday Life
- W.E.B. Dubois,The Souls of Black Folks
- Dr. Kevin Nadal, That’s So Gay!” Microaggressions and the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Community
- Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw,Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement
- James Baldwin, The Fire Next Time
- Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness
- Audre Lorde,The Selected Works of Audre Lorde